http://www.pubdef.org/2008/03/05/as-seen-on-tv/ CHANGE THE GAME Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:59:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://www.pubdef.org/2008/03/05/as-seen-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-16045 Antonio French Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:25:55 +0000 http://www.pubdef.net/2008/03/05/as-seen-on-tv/#comment-16045 You're right, Matt. The sound wasn't great, but I think the ad was effective. It was put together very quickly — incredibly quickly, in fact. The good news is that the next one (coming soon) will be even better. You’re right, Matt. The sound wasn’t great, but I think the ad was effective. It was put together very quickly — incredibly quickly, in fact. The good news is that the next one (coming soon) will be even better.

]]> http://www.pubdef.org/2008/03/05/as-seen-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-16042 MattHurst Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:05:12 +0000 http://www.pubdef.net/2008/03/05/as-seen-on-tv/#comment-16042 I was going to ask you about that, since he's your cannidate. What's up with the sound in the ad? It sounds like someone was recording in that office with an omnidirectional mic or one on the camera. Which would be too bad, because I thought the ad was well scripted, had good editing pace, and looked fresh in shot composition. Except for that mic, this was a pretty good ad. I was going to ask you about that, since he’s your cannidate. What’s up with the sound in the ad? It sounds like someone was recording in that office with an omnidirectional mic or one on the camera. Which would be too bad, because I thought the ad was well scripted, had good editing pace, and looked fresh in shot composition. Except for that mic, this was a pretty good ad.

]]>