<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tear Down the San Luis for a Parking Lot on Lindell?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pubdef.org/2008/03/30/san-luis-or-parking-lot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pubdef.org/2008/03/30/san-luis-or-parking-lot/</link>
	<description>CHANGE THE GAME</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:59:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CWELOV</title>
		<link>http://www.pubdef.org/2008/03/30/san-luis-or-parking-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-17689</link>
		<dc:creator>CWELOV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pubdef.net/?p=2895#comment-17689</guid>
		<description>Just as the students said, the issue at hand IS the building space.  R-K wants to expand classrooms, add an elevator, and improve the building for current and future students.  However, the school cannot obtain the necessary permits to do that work unless they can accomodate parking.  There are many steps that must happen before the school can expand, and providing parking is one of them.  The City of St. louis will not allow a building to be structurally improved unless it is up to code.  R-K&#039;s current parking situation makes it not up to code.  (The only reason it has been able to exist for so many years without parking is that it was &quot;grandfathered in&quot; because it was built in 1922 when students took buses to school.)  Without additional parking, R-K will not be able to expand, the enrollment will decline, and the school will inevitably close.  I see more architectural value in the R-K building from 1922 than the San Luis building.

Also, R-K and the AD have been trying to purchase the Engineer&#039;s Club lot for about 25 years now, and the Engineer&#039;s refuse to sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as the students said, the issue at hand IS the building space.  R-K wants to expand classrooms, add an elevator, and improve the building for current and future students.  However, the school cannot obtain the necessary permits to do that work unless they can accomodate parking.  There are many steps that must happen before the school can expand, and providing parking is one of them.  The City of St. louis will not allow a building to be structurally improved unless it is up to code.  R-K&#8217;s current parking situation makes it not up to code.  (The only reason it has been able to exist for so many years without parking is that it was &#8220;grandfathered in&#8221; because it was built in 1922 when students took buses to school.)  Without additional parking, R-K will not be able to expand, the enrollment will decline, and the school will inevitably close.  I see more architectural value in the R-K building from 1922 than the San Luis building.</p>
<p>Also, R-K and the AD have been trying to purchase the Engineer&#8217;s Club lot for about 25 years now, and the Engineer&#8217;s refuse to sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattHurst</title>
		<link>http://www.pubdef.org/2008/03/30/san-luis-or-parking-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-17247</link>
		<dc:creator>MattHurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pubdef.net/?p=2895#comment-17247</guid>
		<description>I asked my mom about this when we drove by it a couple month ago, because I had heard about this plan.  She said she was driven out from her Catholic high school in the country (well, Washington MO) to see the work the archdiose was doing on this apartment complex.  At the time it was heralded as the upmost in modern progress.
I think the same is true today.  Just like so many part of urban develioment in this city, we can do better than this.  I simply annot believe that we&#039;re still talking about parking lots in the age of $3+ a gallon cars.  It is only a matter of time before public transport, if not outright reurbanization, change this dialog.  We can do better than this, and we will.  Thanks for telling this story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked my mom about this when we drove by it a couple month ago, because I had heard about this plan.  She said she was driven out from her Catholic high school in the country (well, Washington MO) to see the work the archdiose was doing on this apartment complex.  At the time it was heralded as the upmost in modern progress.<br />
I think the same is true today.  Just like so many part of urban develioment in this city, we can do better than this.  I simply annot believe that we&#8217;re still talking about parking lots in the age of $3+ a gallon cars.  It is only a matter of time before public transport, if not outright reurbanization, change this dialog.  We can do better than this, and we will.  Thanks for telling this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VanishingSTL (Paul Hohmann)</title>
		<link>http://www.pubdef.org/2008/03/30/san-luis-or-parking-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-17145</link>
		<dc:creator>VanishingSTL (Paul Hohmann)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pubdef.net/?p=2895#comment-17145</guid>
		<description>Thank you Senior@RK and anonymous for sharing the student perspective.  Both your comments are very encouraging and very opposite of what we heard Saturday morning.  It sounds like building space and not parking space is the bigger physical issue at RK.  The current proposal from the A-D does nothing to address this.  It seems like the A-D should spend the money that they are planning to use to demolish the San Luis and build the lot to address the bigger picture of expansion of RK itself.  If that solution includes some extra parking for faculty and some students (say if they bought the Engineering Club), great, but it seems short sighted to make that the only determining factor in this equasion.  Maybe the A-D should offer the Engineering Club one of the churches they have closed (or some other site) as trade for their building on Lindell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Senior@RK and anonymous for sharing the student perspective.  Both your comments are very encouraging and very opposite of what we heard Saturday morning.  It sounds like building space and not parking space is the bigger physical issue at RK.  The current proposal from the A-D does nothing to address this.  It seems like the A-D should spend the money that they are planning to use to demolish the San Luis and build the lot to address the bigger picture of expansion of RK itself.  If that solution includes some extra parking for faculty and some students (say if they bought the Engineering Club), great, but it seems short sighted to make that the only determining factor in this equasion.  Maybe the A-D should offer the Engineering Club one of the churches they have closed (or some other site) as trade for their building on Lindell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Star Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.pubdef.org/2008/03/30/san-luis-or-parking-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-17137</link>
		<dc:creator>Star Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pubdef.net/?p=2895#comment-17137</guid>
		<description>I blame that damn Slay for this fiasco!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blame that damn Slay for this fiasco!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john w.</title>
		<link>http://www.pubdef.org/2008/03/30/san-luis-or-parking-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-17109</link>
		<dc:creator>john w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pubdef.net/?p=2895#comment-17109</guid>
		<description>NP Mary, that&#039;s what good conversation in an open forum is all about. Pub Def is a great, great blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NP Mary, that&#8217;s what good conversation in an open forum is all about. Pub Def is a great, great blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
